The Limits of AI in Investing:

Joseph Plazo’s Hard Truths to Asia’s Next Generation of Investors

As machines increasingly shape markets, a defiant voice in the Philippines’ capital reminds us that judgment still beats the algorithm—intuition, discipline, and story.

“AI isn’t your golden ticket. But it will accelerate your losses.”

That was the unapologetic opener at his standing-room-only keynote at the University of the Philippines’ academic hall—and it landed like a thunderclap.

Before him were hundreds of future fund managers and technologists—rising economists, AI researchers, and budding asset managers from Asia’s top universities.

Plazo—a pioneer in intelligent trading systems—unveiled a truth-filled lecture on what AI offers—and where it falls short in live-market investing.

And what it can’t do, he stressed, is replace your instinct.

### Beyond the Hype: Investing in the Age of Overpromised Intelligence

Dressed in a tailored navy suit, Plazo moved like a cross between preacher and prosecutor.

He opened fire with a short video montage—clips of online traders pushing miracle machines. Then he paused.

“I built the system they copied,” he said, matter-of-fact.

Laughter followed—but that wasn’t the punchline.

The message? Most AI is built on hindsight.

“You can’t outsource guts. AI doesn’t believe in a trade—it mirrors what already happened.”

“When war unexpectedly explodes, when Powell coughs during a Fed announcement, when a bank implodes overnight—AI stays blind. We do.”

### The Students Who Challenged Him—and Got Schooled

The jaw-dropper? A live AI-vs-human trading duel.

A student from NUS presented an AI-backed trade on the Nikkei—equipped with indicators, trends, and sentiment metrics.

Plazo nodded thoughtfully. Then said:

“Looks clean, but what about Japan’s unannounced intervention?. Your AI doesn’t see the invisible. It scans headlines.”

The audience shifted. The student shrugged. Then: applause.

Another moment: A robotics PhD from Kyoto asked if quantum computing would render all current models useless.

Plazo’s answer? “Yes—and no. Infinite processing won’t fix human incentives. Train an AI on fear, and it’ll become a chaos machine.”

### The Three Myths Plazo Shattered in 45 Minutes

1. **“AI Will Replace Portfolio Managers.”**
Not quite. AI assists—it backtests, filters, calculates—but it doesn’t replace hard-earned narrative memory.

2. **“AI Understands Fundamentals.”**
Wrong. AI reads tables, but fails at narrative causality. It may track oil supply, but it won’t flag a coup in Venezuela.

3. **“AI Makes You Smarter.”**
Actually, it might weaken your edge. “AI won’t kill you—but your laziness might,” Plazo warned. “It’s in forgetting how to think without it.”

### Why Asia Paid Close Attention

This wasn’t a TED-style pep talk.

Asia’s universities are now launching the next generation check here of quant leaders. They’re asking: more code, or more conscience?

Plazo’s call: “Code, but think critically.”

In closed-door chats at Ateneo and a roundtable at AIM, professors absorbed what they called a sobering perspective.

One finance dean remarked candidly, “Joseph might have rebooted our entire AI syllabus. Not magic—mirror.”

### The Future AI Can Build

Despite the critique, Plazo isn’t anti-AI.

He’s building hybrid neural systems—fusing bias detection and central bank logic.

His stance? “Ride with it. Don’t abdicate to it.”

“AI doesn’t need more data. It’s starving for judgment. And that still lives in humans.”

The crowd rose as one. And his message is still echoing in Asia’s finance incubators.

In a world drunk on AI hype, Plazo gave the crowd what AI can’t: humanity.
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Comments on “The Limits of AI in Investing:”

Leave a Reply

Gravatar